Supply chain resilience describes the goal of a robust, rapidly recoverable supply chain. The crucial question, however, remains: How can companies systematically achieve this goal in the face of risks that are increasingly geopolitically driven and only partially predictable?
This is precisely where geostrategic SCM comes in as a concrete solution. It transforms resilient supply chains from an abstract goal into a structured, continuous process:
- Exposure Analysis – Systematic identification of vulnerabilities and opportunities along the entire value chain
- Environmental Scenarios – Development of plausible future scenarios instead of linear forecasts: Thinking and steering in terms of scenarios
- Roadmapping – Identifying prioritized areas of action and developing an actionable roadmap to systematically strengthen resilience
Exposure analysis
The starting point for a geostrategic SCM is the systematic identification of processes along the value chain that are particularly exposed to geopolitical, economic, or regulatory changes, or that present opportunities for development.
As part of a supply chain mapping (status quo assessment), we analyze each company’s procurement, production, and sales operations on a case-by-case basis, evaluating both existing risks and structural potential. We rely on AI-supported methods to conduct the exposure analysis. This allows us to efficiently evaluate large volumes of internal and external data and identify relevant influencing factors at an early stage. This creates a well-founded, tailored foundation on which further strategic decisions can be based.
Development of environmental scenarios
Since the development of global conditions is only partially predictable, a foresight approach is recommended over a purely forecast-based one: Instead of projecting a single future and aligning the company with it, possible and probable development paths are systematically developed and evaluated. Prioritization is carried out at the outset. The relevant time horizon is taken into account, which is determined primarily by the following factors:
- Product life cycles on the sales side
- Costs of new production technologies
- Time required for their implementation
- The speed at which procurement can be realigned
In this way, environmental scenarios are developed that are strategically relevant for the respective company.
Identification of areas for action and roadmapping
Based on the scenarios developed, concrete response scenarios are formulated that illustrate how a company can respond to various developments along the value chain. To this end, alternative approaches are developed across procurement, production, and distribution and are then evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively in terms of costs, service levels, and strategic resilience.
From this evaluation, prioritized areas of action and concrete, company-specific measures are derived and structured into a roadmap. In this way, companies continuously advance their geostrategic SCM.